Maybe all of the nonsense you posted is irrelevant. Maybe you are looking to find ANY reason to discredit a VERY CREDIBLE report by a very smart guy.
I KNOW! Maybe it was just firecrackers. /s
Maybe. I'm not the most qualified to find and present strongest possible efforts towards rational falsification in this kind of thing.
More generally speaking ---when a theory can withstand whatever could falsify it, then, whatever parts of a theory can adequately withstand an honest and applicable effort still stand -- or at the least -- do not fall for those particular reasons. Can you see the value in that? If you're going to play "maybe" games with me, how about allowing benefit of the doubt, and hitting the most likely one too? You missed what my own motivations were.
I'd asked earlier on this thread for the man's name. At right about here in your little rant -- you could have supplied that.