Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Blood of Tyrants; exDemMom

She’s thinking: but it’s rear wheel drive, a V8, body on frame, an American make, more than two decades old.

That adds up to an old muscle car, right?

And you can sorta see her point.

Except we all know that a freaking ‘92 Lincoln isn’t a muscle car in the classic sense.

The question is, why?


73 posted on 10/07/2017 7:26:11 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Yardstick

It was the same engine as the Fox Mustang except Speed Density instead of MASS air.


87 posted on 10/07/2017 7:43:25 PM PDT by Clay Moore (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: Yardstick; Blood of Tyrants
She’s thinking: but it’s rear wheel drive, a V8, body on frame, an American make, more than two decades old.

It's large, it has a 302 cubic inch engine, and it can go from 0 to 60 in 4.5 seconds. My son got it up to 131 mph on a 3.3 mile speed track.

It sure seems like a muscle car to me.

It would be totally awesome if it could be restored.

106 posted on 10/07/2017 10:08:57 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson