Baloney.
If you look around the internet at all (no, I'm not doing your homework for you) you can find orbital parameters for any civilian satellite (and many military) that you might be interested in. If you know anything useful about optics, you can also determine whether or not (usually not) you can expect to resolve them as other than a dot with your little backyard telescope.
You need to do a LOT of learning.
I had a discussion today on your Iowa battleship analogy about losing the tech to go to the moon.
Why don't you clarify exactly why the analogy is apt to NASA losing tech to go to the moon.
You mean we no longer have vacuum tube technology at NASA?
And do you mean we no longer have the facilities to build a battleship like the Iowa.. but the schematics and blueprints exist?
The way NASA presents their lost of tech to go to the moon, is as if it was data loss.
Data loss the same way they said they lost Apollo videos and film.
Data loss is what NASA is claiming...
And you still have not explained the 1000mph spin on the earth works with satellites... and why we can't see them more clearly.
But don't worry, not even NASA can explain why they had the recent eclipse showing the moon revolving around the earth in the wrong direction...
Bizarre NASA phooey.