Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick

Way back before there was a CNBC, its predecessor was FNN (Financial News Network). Late 80s, early 90s.

There was this old gent who did commentary, mostly on bonds - Ed Hart. I’ll never forget a discussion he was having with someone about some company’s “worth.” He noted that “worth” was not an accurate term to use - the proper phrase was “presently valued at.” It always changes.


32 posted on 10/11/2017 7:11:54 AM PDT by abb ("News reporting is too important to be left to the journalists." Walter Abbott (1950 -))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: abb

It’s an important economic concept that often lost or flat denied. Artistic “worth,” moral “worth,” and practical “worth” are all concepts we can discuss philosophically or emotionally, but economic worth is what someone will give you, in a free exchange, right now.

The dress I’m wearing was “worth” about $40 when someone bought it new at Dress Barn. When she donated it to The Salvation Army, it was worth zero. When I bought it at The Salvation Army, it was worth $2.50.


33 posted on 10/11/2017 9:30:21 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson