Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeMind
Those states have plenty of remaining infrastructure and are “states.” Only “states” get Constitutional protection that “states” get. “Territories” govern themselves, but have US residency, as well. They are run like a separate country.

You express yourself so unclearly that I don't quite understand your statement - but I suspect that you are wrong.

Your statement that "only 'states' get Constitutional protection that 'states' get" is, of course, a tautology, and hence pretty useless.

Territories do, of course, exercise a limited form of self-government - it is thus ridiculous to assert that they are "run like a separate country."

I don't understand what you mean by "territories [having] US residency." A territory cannot "have" residency.

Regards,

41 posted on 09/26/2017 8:10:10 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: alexander_busek
All “citizens” of a US territory have US residency. I hope that clarifies was was meant.

With all but one of our US territories, only portions of our US Constitution apply to each.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unincorporated_territories_of_the_United_States

Only states get all the protection and expectations of our Federal government.

I’m always glad to teach the Constitution to others!

45 posted on 09/26/2017 8:27:58 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson