The poster I responded to mentioned LA.
I looked at ESPNs list for 3 years, and near the bottom of the list for all 3 years, LA is listed.
The previous poster was trying to make a point about terrible attendance of LA. So I looked at the bottom of the list for 3 years. Why would I concern myself with who did what in the middle?
The point is, league wise attendance is rising. To focus on one team out of 32 to try and prove a point is ludicrous.
It says Los Angeles because those teams are now in Los Angeles. However, the only statistics for Los Angeles that are valid are the Rams in 2016.
Plus since one of the two Los Angeles teams show there is credited with only one home game, the numbers are suspect.