Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: IronJack

I think a crime of passion would be killing the man (or woman) if you walk in on them in bed. Killing someone raping a child would be a self defense. (especially if she felt she was protecting the child’s life... by saying “I thought he was smothering/choking her”). Either way.. put me in the jury. Not Guilty.


75 posted on 09/15/2017 2:29:26 PM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: momtothree
She claimed she became enraged. The defense would be that, in her (justifiable) rage, she lost the distinction between right and wrong, and was therefore incapable of forming criminal intent. The inability to distinguish right from wrong is the legal definition of insanity (from Latin "in-" (not) and "sano" (sound)).

It can be proven that the loss of "soundness" was the result of her observing her child in danger, and that her anger overcame her reason. Since she recovered her reason once the rage had passed, it was only temporary.

Thus, a defense of temporary insanity.

"Insanity" has a very precise legal meaning; it does NOT mean "crazy."

84 posted on 09/15/2017 3:57:58 PM PDT by IronJack (sh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson