The full WSJ article is not available without subscription. There was an interview on Tucker Carlson tonight. I will try to find and post a link.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPVn6phiObs
If you perform a more diligent web search, Mr. Dees was actively involved in fundraising for George McGovern and others until Ted Kennedy—chief fundraiser.
Political activism and legal activism were combined during the noble SPLC era.
By Carol M. Swain
Sept. 11, 2017 7:07 p.m. ET
755 COMMENTS
Richard Cohen, president of the Southern Poverty Law Center, was to testify before the House Homeland Security Committee about threats posed by domestic extremist groups. The hearing, scheduled for Tuesday, has been postponed because of Hurricane Irma. As a black conservative who has been smeared by the SPLC, I recommend against reinviting Mr. Cohen.
When Morris Dees and Joseph J. Levin Jr. started the SPLC in 1971, it was needed and it had noble goals. In recent years, however, it has become a tool of the radical left. Domestically, it uses its influence to paint with a broad brush that smears immigration restrictionists, orthodox Christian churches and pro-family organizations as hate groups.
What landed me in the SPLCs crosshairs was a Sept. 10, 2009, Huffington Post blog entry titled Mission Creep and the Southern Poverty Law Centers Misguided Focus. I pointed out the SPLCs silence about video footage released after the 2008 elections showing members of the New Black Panther Party, decked out in full paramilitary regalia, patrolling a polling precinct in Philadelphia where they were clearly intimidating white voters.
Although several news organizations covered the story, the SPLC ignored the incident. At the time, the law center was spending an inordinate amount of time attacking then-CNN host Lou Dobbs for his relentless focus on illegal immigration. It demanded that CNN fire the anchor. After CNN and Mr. Dobbs parted ways, the SPLC took credit for getting him off the air. I ended my post with a one-liner that raised the ire of the organization and had a devastating effect on my life. I wrote: Rather than monitoring hate groups, the Southern Poverty Law Center has become one.
The SPLCs retaliation was vicious and effective. On Oct. 17, 2009, my photo appeared on the front page of my local newspaper, the Tennessean, with the headline Carol Swain is an apologist for white supremacists.
That was a quote from Mark Potok, at the time the SPLCs national spokesman. The context for Mr. Potoks attack was a review I gave for a film titled A Conversation About Race. I endorsed it for classroom use because it offered a perspective on race rarely encountered on university campuses. Mr. Potok argued that the filmmaker was a bigot. I felt then and now that the perspective needed to be heard.
This negative article was featured on the front pages of several newspapers and it went viral, especially in black media outlets. The attacks did not subside until this newspapers website published a lengthy article titled In Defense of Carol Swain.
Being targeted by the SPLC has had a lasting impact on my life and career. Offers from other universities ended and speaking opportunities declined. Once youve been smeared in this way, mainstream news outlets are less likely to cite you as an expert of any kind.
Yet today I wear the SPLCs mud as a badge of honor because I know I am in the company of many good men and women who have been similarly vilified for standing for righteousness and truth. Other SPLC targets have included Ben Carson (who eventually received an apology and retraction), Somali refugee Ayaan Hirsi Ali, terrorism expert Steve Emerson, political scientist Guenter Lewy (who successfully sued the SPLC), attorney Robert Muise, Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy, and Princeton professor Robert P. George. The SPLC has tagged Mr. George, a devout Catholic intellectual, as anti-LGBT.
Whatever label the SPLC assigns, such smears are harmful and designed to destroy the individuals credibility and ability to have influence in the public square.
Some of those vilified by the SPLC have been subjected to even worse treatment. The Family Research Council and House Majority Whip Steve Scalise have been violently attacked by individuals inspired by the propaganda the SPLC regularly dishes outwhich is often accepted without criticism and passed on by media, law-enforcement agencies and universities.
The SPLC should not be dignified with invitations to provide congressional testimony about domestic extremism as long as it continues to advance a transparently partisan agendaone Mr. Potok has publicly acknowledged is designed to destroy groups it opposes.
Ms. Swain, a former professor of political science and law at Vanderbilt University, is author of The New White Nationalism in America: Its Challenge to Integration.
Appeared in the September 12, 2017, print edition.
Subscribe Sign In