Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Eddie01
Under the Act, the Queen would remain head of state but would have reduced duties without abdicating the throne.


"Ehhhhhh, just one question. What, exactly, are her duties?"

22 posted on 09/04/2017 11:43:49 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Eagle

“Ehhhhhh, just one question. What, exactly, are her duties?”

Protecting the royal treasurey up to an including turning a blind eye to a murderous invasion of her country.


28 posted on 09/04/2017 11:47:10 AM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Texas Eagle

That’s what I want to know! What duties?!


37 posted on 09/04/2017 11:51:38 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Texas Eagle
"Ehhhhhh, just one question. What, exactly, are her duties?"

Duties, or Doodies?

Caddieshack reference here...

43 posted on 09/04/2017 11:57:43 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Texas Eagle

The Queen has a lot more powers and duties and most know. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy_of_the_United_Kingdom For example, she appoints the Prime Minister and is Commander in Chief of the military.


74 posted on 09/04/2017 12:40:57 PM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson