If someone can present proof, in writing, of a birth somewhere oher than Hawai’i, I’m open to looking at it as I am sure the rest of the world would be too. Until that written proof becomes available, I’ll continue to go with what currently exists in writing.
Records from a Canadian home for unwed mothers would certianly be interesting but as we now know from the court rulings on Senator Ted Cruz’s birth in Canada to an American mother and a non-citizen father, it would not be disqualifying.
“In an article entitled “Is Ted Cruz a natural-born citizen eligible to serve as president?” published by the Constitution Center on 28 October 2013, scholar Sarah Helene Duggin explained that while the Supreme Court has never ruled on the precise meaning of a “natural born citizen,” previous presidential bids by foreign-born candidates such as John McCain and George Romney have established legal precedents for Cruz to run in 2016. Duggin also pointed to the Naturalization Act of 1790, which states that “children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural-born citizens”:
The Naturalization Act of 1790 probably constitutes the most significant evidence available. Congress enacted this legislation just three years after the drafting of the Constitution, and many of those who voted on it had participated in the Constitutional Convention.”
Leftists are, if I may speak frankly, tedious. You don’t even read what I post, much less respond to it. Yet you somehow feel entitled to keep posting to me. As if this is a one-way street, and you can blow off everything I write, unread, but I’m still supposed to read what you post.
It doesn’t work that way.