Since you admit your case for killing millions is so weak you can’t even convince 1/2 of Congress, why even discuss further
If you want to draw 1930s analogies, you sound awfully similar to those national -socialists in Germany who were braying for war because they felt threatened by the Poles.
Where did I ever advocate killing millions? I did not. I would simply remove Kim, his leadership team (all except three) and his offensive military capacity.
Regarding the 30’s, you far-left liberal peacenicks forget that those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it.
You also forget that WWII was, in it early and middle stages, a very near thing. Had it not been for dozens of favorable lucky outcomes; the Norse Hydro, Franco’s refusal to permit German troops on Spanish soil to attack Gibraltar and therefore control the supply routes in the Med, (and therefore the UK would have lost North Africa, freeing Rommel and his Africa Corps for duty elsewhere), The Midway intercepts and carrier action, Admiral Canaris’ anti-Nazi help, Hitler’s idiocy in some areas, i.e. Operation Barbarossa, and many others, we easily could have lost the war.
Why do you want to give Kim the good chance to win this one?