[mrsmith]

Bah.
The AT just used a language that fit it’s programming.
Because that’s what it was programmed to do.
The ‘inventing’ was done in the original program.

Choices aren’t always intelligent.

[mylife]

AI can’t handle colloquialisms.

[Chode]

saying "the" FIVE times is faster than using "5"???

[tbw2]

Why Artificial Intelligences Will Think Like Us
https://hubpages.com/technology/Why-Artificial-Intelligences-Will-Think-Like-Us

[SERKIT]

That’s how Jive and Urban Gullah were invented, too.

[usconservative]

This story's actually several weeks old by now however it gives us some pretty good insight into the capabilities of AI, the the learning algorithms behind it, etc..

My question however after reading articles such as this one (and similar ones about Google for example) is: Is AI a man made life form?

Did we create "life?" If an intelligence, even artificial one can make a decision that one language is too slow, decides then to create its own and is outside the parameters of what mankind can understand, is artificial intelligence then "life?"

In the meantime, "Alexa - play me some music to mow my lawn by!"

[henbane]

[ChessExpert]

The game of chess has long been an AI topic. Chess playing computer programs are very strong. Why?

They are really good and fast at computing. I can ponder a position for 5 minute. In that time, the computer will examine millions of positions. I might examine 20 positions.

However, I’ve learned that there is no intelligence to chess playing computers.

For example, they will repeat the position (in all respects) and change their evaluation as a result. 12Rc1 may be rated equal, but waste some time and play 14Rc1 in the exact same position and the computer thinks white has the advantage. People understand and know better.

Create an impregnable fortress, material down. For example White is up a queen for a rook, but there is no way to make progress. That is a drawn position. The computer thinks white is won, but it can not demonstrate the win, or make any progress at all. Yet the computer will think white is winning forever if allowed to do so. (Thank goodness for the 50 move rule). Not only cam people understand, but they can learn too. Even an average player will figure this out: “Huh. I thought I could win this, but I can’t.”

I conclude that there is no intelligence in artificial intelligence.

[Montana_Sam]

This is too easy: garbage in; garbage out.

[Zathras]

Helping FB find me with secret new language.
FUFB