...his history doesn’t point to that or any violence in the name of Islam. Thus far the only thing proven is that it was a careless shooting for now with more to come out.
More than a careless shooting. This guy was a ticking time bomb, if you will excuse the overused idiom. He had 3 complaints filed against him. What were those complaints? Did those complaints indicate that he has animus toward women or other certain groups?
These questions come in addition to what is mentioned in another article: “He is just a trigger-happy, panicky, reckless individual who held his job not because he was fit for it, but because of what he symbolized.”
This incessant need to make it more than it is in the present is ideaology and that is just as dangerous as Muslim fanatisism.
Really? A person jumping to conclusions or attributing more to a situation than may be present in his or her comments on the Internet are as dangerous as Muslim fanaticism?
Everyone has ideological beliefs. I daresay that there are few as dangerous as radical Islam or their handmaidens, the Communists.
Yes tying everything to a terrorist act or as the basis for ones actions is just as dangerous. I work with highly paid professional Muslims in technology and they are not involved in anything terror related.
Working people into a frenzy with no basis of fact as of yet tying a bad shooting to terrorism is yes just as bad.
It’s not far removed from a Klan rally