[sparklite2]

We abort millions of healthy fetuses and you make an issue of
aborting damaged ones?

[samtheman]

We abort millions of healthy fetuses and you make an issue of
aborting damaged ones?

---

I don’t know what you are talking about.

Nothing in my post says anything about supporting any kind of abortion whatsoever.

I am against all abortions. Period.

[tbpiper]

The issue is not about just about a damaged fetus. It is about the world view that Darwinism fosters. If one believes that life is just the product of slime plus time, then life, damaged or not, has no intrinsic value. The idea of 'survival of the fittest' would then be the determining rule. The question then becomes who determines what 'fit' is.

A damaged fetus is not fit and is perfectly disposable in this mind set, a mind set that can be expanded to include those who do not think fitly either. That is to say that believing outside of what is politically acceptable could be declared to be unfit for the progressive development of society.