It also required slavery be allowed and that no state could take any action to end the practice. That is why the “State Rights” argument is pure Male Bovine Scat.
Not going to weigh in on that.
We did discuss the Confederate Constitution a bit in Constitutional Law class. I came to the conclusion that (as with so many other things) there are people who know *WAY* more than I do on *BOTH* sides of the issue.
“...and that no state could take any action to end the practice. That is why the State Rights argument is pure Male Bovine Scat.”
Could you provide the wording of the issue you cite?