This is really not Breitbart’s style (though I am not the closest adherent)
If evidence in support of some news item ceases to flow, they won’t report on it relentlessly, unceasingly.
Evidence of Russian interference in the ‘16 election is claimed to be gushing forth from an infinite-source fountain with the tacit implication that at some point, you will see the smoking gun, smell the burnt powder, and be able to gather microscopic bullet fragments.
I am willing to believe the Russians TRIED to do whatever they tried to do. I don’t think they changed any votes.
But whether Trump had any involvement in the effort, at all, even one bit, I see zero evidence of that. But the MSM cannot get enough of this jag. When that jag (”Collusion”) fades a bit, they run to obstruction. What that one fades, they run back to collusion. They cannot let this go. When they land on obstruction, they go to Flynn. When they land on Flynn, they go back to Russia. It’s a perfect circle.
I don’t get the impression that Breitbart engages in lying. They may become misled. I don’t think they deliberately set out to lie. CNN absolutely does.
Of course they tried to interfere. Great powers and lesser powers always interfere in the affairs of their rivals. The USA is, of course, not excepted. We interfere in the affairs of other countries more than any others do simply because we are more able.