I think it’s Stephen Breyer who has been the big advocate for international law.
That would be a game where you pick the international law that supports your preferred outcome.
Many countries ban abortion or make it extremely difficult. Would the “international law” advocates on the SCOTUS be willing to consider those legal traditions?
Many countries ban abortion or make it extremely difficult. Would the “international law” advocates on the SCOTUS be willing to consider those legal traditions?
Not a chance. The whole idea of considering international law, is to give the justices a wider range of precedents so that they can pick and choose and find something to support their preferences and opinions.
I think it’s Stephen Breyer who has been the big advocate for international law.
You’re right.