[Cboldt]

-- Was Comey's prehearing written "opening statement" admitted into testimony in such a way as to make it under oath? --

Opinions will differ on that. The inquisitors took it as part of the hearing record, but there was no dirrect affirmation by Comey, in any form, that he swore the statement was true.

Separately, reviewing the hearing transcript, Comey swore under oath:

LANKFORD: Let me -- let me walk through a couple things with you. Your notes were obviously exceptionally important, because they give a very rapid account of what you -- what you wrote down and what you perceived to happen in those different meetings.

Have you had the opportunity to be able to reference those notes when you were preparing the written statement that you put -- for us today?

COMEY: Yes, I -- yes. I think nearly all of my written recordings of my conversations -- had a chance to review them before filing my statement.

LANKFORD: Do you have a copy of any those notes, personally?

COMEY: I don't. I turned them over to Bob Mueller's investigators.

LANKFORD: The individual that you told about your memos, that then sent on to the New York Times -- do they have a copy of those memos, or were they told orally of those memos?

COMEY: Had a copy -- had a copy at the time.

Comey and Mueller are in cahoots.

[Daffynition]

Look on Weinie’s laptop.

Leaky-Leaky P Comey, claims they were on HilLIEry’s server.

[Jim Noble]

“Comey and Mueller are in cahoots”

Not only that. The invented “memos”, supposedly to trigger appointment of a special counsel? That was a done deal before the NYT spilled a drop of ink, including the identity of Mueller and Rosenstein’s recusal.

All of this - all of it - is what the spooks call a “legend”. You will never get to the bottom of it because it’s an illusion.