Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: eastforker

Did you not read? It was a protest. It was not a zookeeper feeding. It was meant to be horrifying because the shareholders were furious about not making a profit. So now I have answered your “question” twice.


63 posted on 06/08/2017 5:46:27 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: yldstrk

No, you have not. Would you still feel the same way if they had shot the donkey before they fed him to the tigers? Or are you upset that they did this in the public eye? They actually make documentaries about animals killing and eating other animals, to me it makes no difference if it was a protest or a normal feeding ritual.


64 posted on 06/08/2017 5:52:53 AM PDT by eastforker (All in, I'm all Trump,what you got!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk

From the article:

“Although the incident with the donkey was not sanctioned, zoos in other parts of China regularly feed live animals to tigers for the amusement of the public,” the newspaper writes. “Guests visiting one tiger sanctuary in north-east China’s Heilongjiang province can pay to have a live cow or chicken hurled into the tiger enclosure.”


65 posted on 06/08/2017 5:56:35 AM PDT by eastforker (All in, I'm all Trump,what you got!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson