You are welcome to post any evidence refuting him.
That's one reason why I asked him if he's a scientist.
Refuting something is not the same as proving something. And that's the big problem with the so-called creation scientists: They equate refuting with proving. The best that creationists can do is raise speculative doubts about a scientific theory, while proving their own theory on Biblical faith. That's fine and I respect that, but Biblical faith is not science.