Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sean Hannity Is Going to War With FOX News: "I Am Not FOX News.com, I Retract Nothing,"
Vice News ^ | May 23 2017, 5:00pm | MIKE PEARL

Posted on 05/23/2017 7:12:17 PM PDT by drewh

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-194 next last
To: JBW1949

Hannity just backed off...No mention of Dotcom guy tonight....

Seth Rich’s family asked him to back-off.. So I heard.


61 posted on 05/23/2017 8:35:41 PM PDT by Davy Crocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blackberry1
Hannity just Tweeted this :

"Ok TO BE CLEAR, I am closer to the TRUTH than ever. Not only am I not stopping, I am working harder. Updates when available. Stay tuned!"

Tweet

62 posted on 05/23/2017 8:39:16 PM PDT by TheCipher (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: odawg
Nope. He just caved.

Maybe but I'm not so sure. He said he would stop discussing it. I didn't hear him say he would stop investigating it.

It doesn't really matter what the family wants. Justice doesn't follow the wishes of the living relatives; it follows the evidence. Let's see where they evidence leads...

63 posted on 05/23/2017 8:40:21 PM PDT by Boomer (Stupid is as stupid does and no one does stupid like the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheCipher

He also retweeted Kim.com again and Used a justice for Seth Rich hashtag.

Sean did back off on Fox News. But I think he still is in the hunt overall


64 posted on 05/23/2017 8:42:11 PM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Davy Crocket
Seth Rich’s family asked him to back-off.. So I heard.

That is an "interesting" family. And the girlfriend? George Webb calls it a school play.

Body Language: Seth Rich family

You can even ignore the commentary and just watch them.

65 posted on 05/23/2017 8:42:47 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

“Maybe but I’m not so sure. He said he would stop discussing it. I didn’t hear him say he would stop investigating it.”

That is precisely how I heard it.


66 posted on 05/23/2017 8:42:49 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

You know something. (not a question).

Won’t be too long before Hannity and who ever else is interested discover that there are TENS OF THOUSANDS, MAYBE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of kids who have a particular skill set honed by 16 years of US combat operations against an insurgency opponent.

“I WILL find you, and I WILL kill you” kind of stuff.

Hannity only has the problem of finding the guys he needs, and that isn’t much of a problem. The pool of people who have that skill set is rather large.

Anybody trying to use “muscle” against people they want to keep silent these days is taking his or her life into his or her own hands.

Besides that, from what i understand, Hannity has some skills of his own in that respect. Threatening his family is NOT a good idea.


67 posted on 05/23/2017 8:45:36 PM PDT by Calvinist_Dark_Lord ((I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blackberry1

CRTV and Michelle Malkin should get on this if they have the guts to do it. They have no advertisers.


68 posted on 05/23/2017 8:51:20 PM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Someone who is a reliable wikileaks partner posted a video response to Kim Dotcom’s antics. He was basically called a charlatan and a hanger on who is only inserting himself into matters that he is not involved in for publicity purposes. If you follow wikileaks/ Julian Assange on twitter you can find a better link to video if you dont like this one.

TL;DR Dotcom was basically called a big phony.


69 posted on 05/23/2017 8:52:29 PM PDT by 31R1O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

Have you considered the deep state is deploying terrorist attacks/threats against anyone discussing Seth Rich?


70 posted on 05/23/2017 8:54:58 PM PDT by txhurl (Time to blow the Queen and King off the board, DJT, and by your birthday, or on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: drewh

He was forced to say he won’t be talking about it on his tv show.

So many people are so cruel to Hannity on twitter right now. Just because he is fighting to be the truth out, at the risk of his job. No other talker is this brave. If you agree with me, add to the #IstandwithHannity hashtag on twitter. At the very least it will warm Sean’s heart as he fights for justice for Seth Rich. Even Seth’s own family appears to have been threatened or unduly influenced.


71 posted on 05/23/2017 9:05:54 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Sean is starting to act up. He probably feels like the Last of the Mohicans. Glenn Beck keeps leaving voice mail and texts; “Hey Sean, old buddy, Call Me. Let’s have lunch, My treat!!!”


72 posted on 05/23/2017 9:09:02 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

I thought Glenn Beck invested in Gold Line for his security in gold and silver? His radio show ads for Gold Line makes you think he’s an expert and a very savvy investor. Is he really broke?


73 posted on 05/23/2017 9:14:00 PM PDT by Blue Highway (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain

The “weaponized autistics” aren’t letting this go even if Sean does.


74 posted on 05/23/2017 9:14:45 PM PDT by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Seriously, Sean doesn’t care about the salary as much as he does his relationship with his viewers and being able to inform and opine and even entertain. He’s been talking the last couple of weeks as if he knows his tv job is tenuous. So why would he drop this coverage? Clearly something more important was threatened. I’d agree: the kids.


75 posted on 05/23/2017 9:17:42 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Seems like Fox was this close to losing Hannity too.

Hohoho.


76 posted on 05/23/2017 9:22:41 PM PDT by Impy (End the kritarchy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LongWayHome

Hannity just said: “hopefully, we will see you here tomorrow night”. His job was on the line tonight.


Sheesh. I’d better watch him at 10 when his show is on again. Was watching the hockey.


77 posted on 05/23/2017 9:25:55 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: LS

There is evidence in the cameras, in forensics, in the hospital Seth was taken to. There isn’t the slightest doubt this was a sloppy hit job. Assange, last summer, went out on a limb by almost revealing his source. I will never forget that nor the story Terry Reed told to us in his book, “Compromised”. Nor will I forget the sinister Bob Creamer, on the Project Veritas video. Creamer told us exactly how ruthless he and his bosses can be. “Diabolical” was how Scott Fogel described Obama’s frequent WH visitor. Sean Hannity has gone up in my esteem for standing with Trump against the mob.


78 posted on 05/23/2017 9:35:08 PM PDT by The Westerner (Protect the most vulnerable: get the government out of medicine and education!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Hannity’s goal was to get someone with legal authority to take the investigation seriously. Another option for backing off is he has met this goal.


79 posted on 05/23/2017 9:35:55 PM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: txhurl
Have you considered the deep state is deploying terrorist attacks/threats against anyone discussing Seth Rich?

There really is only one person that can prove that Rich was the leaker of the info - Assange. If he were to prove it, the whole Russia conspiracy thing and the reasons for the unmasking - go down the drain. It will destroy the Dems. They can't allow that to happen. They will go to any means to stop it. I think Assange had better start to rethink his non disclosure policy in this case. After all, the leaker is dead so no harm will come to him. The only harm now is to Assange. He is the loose thread. Right now he has the protection of the Ecuadoran embassy. The reason he got the protection was the fake charges against him for rape in Sweden. Sweden has now dropped the case. The only thing keeping him in the embassy is an arrest warrant the British have on him for not obeying a court order. If the British drop that, the embassy has no more reason to offer protection. They may say to him - goodbye. Now he has no protection and is out in public - a target. The only way to make himself less of a target is to release all the info now. Once it is out there, with a videotaped deposition - there would be no need to knock him off. It wouldn't accomplish anything.

80 posted on 05/23/2017 9:35:58 PM PDT by TheCipher (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson