To: Kid Shelleen
Assembly language is the only way to go. :)
6 posted on
05/23/2017 2:07:24 PM PDT by
Claud
To: Claud
Assembler is for pussies. Code in raw binary! ;)
8 posted on
05/23/2017 2:09:16 PM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: Claud
39 posted on
05/23/2017 2:41:10 PM PDT by
Kid Shelleen
(Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
To: Claud
Agreed! I program mostly in Java, and C#, but I still get to do quite a bit of IBM Assembler. I love writing assembler code. People as me if coding in assembler is hard, and I tell them no - as long as you can keep the difference between, L and LA straight!
61 posted on
05/23/2017 3:10:12 PM PDT by
MMaschin
(The difference between strategy and tactics!)
To: Claud
Does assembler from 1982 count? Liked that one too - came back to it when I was doing malware analysis.
75 posted on
05/23/2017 3:44:05 PM PDT by
KosmicKitty
(Waiting for inspirations)
To: Claud
Assembly language is the only way to go. :)
No, but you cannot argue with the execution time of assembly code.
98 posted on
05/23/2017 4:39:19 PM PDT by
Texas Fossil
((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
To: Claud
Assembly language is the only way to go. :) Absolutely right! What other language has PEEK and POKE as commands?
134 posted on
05/23/2017 7:27:01 PM PDT by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
