I think it would be helpful if you would provide the background, as to what is the ordinance, what was done/allegedly done to violate, what communication there has been, etc. The way the problem has been stated is a little cryptic, IMHO.
the allegation is that weeds grew more than 8” high.
the alleged weeds were cut down within a 2-3 weeks.
then a notice of continued violation was received.
basically the city seems to want to use a 12 year old weed ordinance to force property owners to replace lawns with some sort of drought resistant landscaping, at a cost of $2k+. the city offers up to $1k in compensation.
city can levy fines up to $100/day.
objections to the bureacrat mgr were all dismissed. threats of fines continue.