Vs anarchy?
I am not an absolute anarchist like some. We must have a structure which means laws and such and this understanding starts at an early age.
And yes, especially these days, kids are unruly and even violent at a very young age. Unlike before. It has gotten worse over the past 10 years.
The modern belief is that we must try to understand the root of a child’s problem which is actually a good idea I guess. However, we push it to the point where it does harm by offering excuses to a child for his or her behavior and we tell them that is okay to act out on their emotions to help them “work through it.” This a recipe for disaster since eventually they will have to conform to something — a job, a marriage, the city laws and regulations.
Totalitarianism vs anarchy?
That’s a bit of a false dilemma—there is quite a bit of middle ground you missed. Of course, we need law, but law cannot replace moral restraint. Using police for school discipline is the end result of liberal education policies. From a liberal perspective, it makes sense—just like using our military as a meals-on-wheels program. The problem with both approaches is that they deny the very purpose of the respective offices—the police exist to protect society from criminals while the military protects us from foreign powers. Their training and operations are specific and completely valid in the proper sphere, but absolutely unsuited for dealing with the general public.
I worked in adoption for years, so you don’t have to convince me there are dangerous children—our child welfare system excels at producing them, but that’s another topic. I have visited every type of institution associated with “problem children,” and the one common element is a lack of moral instruction and a complete lack of discipline due to liberal philosophies. The numerous evils of the Dickensonian orphanages are only exceeded by our current system, and that’s not hyperbole.
However; this article deals with a child disrupting a class by rude behavior. Such behavior needs to be addressed, but not by any type of police action. Let’s be truthful here—unless the child has a weapon, seventh graders are no threat to any adult male—and, yes, principals should be males—preferably with the word Marine prominently in their resumes.
We used to joke about your “permanent record;” children today are living in a dystopian novel where childish pranks result in court actions that disrupt lives and destroy families. Unless you’ve been the target of such actions, you’ll never understand the danger. It’s real and far exceeds the danger of any seventh-graders forced burp or even attempted violence.