Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dangus

There will always be evil. Guns, by and of themselves, are not evil. The defense of oneself against evil is noble and the antithesis of evil.

In your perfect utopia there is no evil. In the real world you have a right - some would argue a responsibility - to fight evil.

The second amendment was drafted by men with first-hand experience in having their freedom denied. To call it a necessary evil is an affront to natural law.


44 posted on 04/25/2017 4:17:22 PM PDT by NY.SS-Bar9 (Those that vote for a living outnumber those that work for one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: NY.SS-Bar9

Again:

A necessary evil is an unfavorable thing that someone believes must be done or accepted because it is necessary to achieve a better outcome—especially because possible alternative courses of action or inaction would be worse... In Common Sense, Thomas Paine described government as at best a “necessary evil.”...

The use of the term “evil” in the phrase does not indicate that the thing being characterized as a “necessary evil” is something that is generally considered an “evil” in the sense of being immoral or the enemy of the good. In Fuller’s use of the phrase, for example, there is no implication that court jesters are evil people, or having one serves an evil end.


45 posted on 04/25/2017 6:10:00 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson