Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: xsmommy

Just defending the principle of ownership and of following the instructions of crew and law enforcement.

We would be critical of a young black man who got “manhandled” after refusing to follow police instructions. Not sure why the rules are different for an old Asian man.


15 posted on 04/13/2017 6:59:03 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave
don't really find the situations analogous. This guy paid to be on this flight and as pointed out in the article, once ON it, a different rule applies:

Rule 21, entitled “Refusal of Transport,” is very different because it clearly and expressly covers situations in which a passenger who has already boarded the plane can be removed… The rule, which unlike the denied boarding rule does provide for removal “from the aircraft at any point,” lists some two dozen justifications including: unruly behavior, intoxication, inability to fit into one seat, medical problems or concerns, etc. But nowhere in the list of some two dozen reasons is there anything about over booking, the need to free up seats, the need for seats to accommodate crew members to be used on a different flight etc.

yeah, a prudent person would bitch but acquiesce to the request to get off. that in no way justifies the manner in which this guy was forced off the plane and there is little doubt that he's going to be one very rich elderly Asian man.

16 posted on 04/13/2017 7:04:21 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson