But of course! Everyone knows that wack-a-doodles have no rights in our society! Tazer 'em! Beat 'em up!
If you *know* you have a *past*, then, if in your right mind, why would you put up such a fuss?
That's the spirit! We need more sheeple! Obey or you'll get what's coming to you!
 |
 |
 |
 |
All that and a pack of peanuts.
So interesting to see such contempt for both contract law and the whole due process thing here on FR. (Yes I know this case did not involve due process but the attitude of “he got what was coming to him” certainly hints at such contempt)
The idea that abuse is justified because one dared to balked at being told they must give up something they are very much entitled to by reason of a binding contract is puzzling to me.
Maybe we could refer to this as the Mugabe option.