Shameful behavior by Sen Schumer. I think this is both a political & a misogynistic attack.
Sen Schumer must resign - for harassing and attaching his constituent.
Schumer should cry some fake tears and stomp around.
I hope he winds up in prison until he dies.
Joseph A. Califano Jr. 85 the former US secretary of health, education and welfare under President Jimmy Carter and domestic policy adviser to President Lyndon B. Johnson and his wife, Hilary- 77 were having a quiet dinner when the classless Chuckie Schumer made a complete A$$ out of himself in the restaurant then chased the couple out to the sidewalk... yelling, “His a liar! His a LIAR!”
Schumer is making a scene to make the news, nothing more. I’d guess he called the journalist to tell him what was going to happen in advance.
Sounds like fake news....
Could not happen to more deserving liar
Well, this proves it - when a Dem goes to the trouble to abuse an octogenarian in public - Schuck’s running against Slow Joe in 2020, and pity the poor Bobo wannabes (Patrick and Booker) vying for PAC contributor crumbs...
Me thinks the senator doth protest too much.
If you or a loved one need help dealing with this highly debilitating disease, call 1-800-GET-OVERIT! (TOLL FREE)
In connection with a thought I had about Hitlery Clinton and Tim Kaine, I did some research on the word “harridan,” I discovered that there is no male gender equivalent word.
A harridan is, of course, an angry and unpleasant woman; a shrew. IOW, Hitlary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren, Maxine Waters, et al. There are other harridans out and about, but you get the gist/flavor of my meaning, I think.
Merriam-Webster further suggests that the word is, perhaps, a modification of French “haridelle,” meaning, old horse, gaunt woman.
There are male harridans: Chuckie Schumer and Dingy Harry Reid fall readily to mind. As does Tim Kaine and John McCain. There are, of course, others: ALL ARE LIEBERAL DEMOCRATS! Save John McCain, who doesn’t know WHAT he is!
While not all male LIEberal Democrats are male harridans, all male harridans are LIEberal Democrats, (except, as noted, John McCain) and of course, ALL harridans are LIEberal Democrats!
One other characteristic of harridans I discovered is that they are “venomous.”
Mirriam-Webster is useful here, also: “expressing very strong hatred or anger.”
The word “venomous” is useful when discussing harridans and their male equivalents, so I generally use “venomous harridans” to describe particularly nasty females of the LIEberal Democrat persuasion.
Now you see how necessary it is for us to determine a word to describe the male equivalent of a harridan, particularly since we might want to preface the word with “venomous,” as, just as all harridans are venomous, all male harridans are venomous!
What word could we use to define a male harridan?
DUMP |
SCHMUCK |
Why Chuckie's so cheesed...?
Saul Alinskys Rules from Rules for Radicals
Saul Alinsky describes 24 rules in Rules for Radicals. Of those 24 rules, 13 are rules of power tactics:
1. Power is not only what you have but what the enemy
thinks you have.
2. Never go outside the experience of your people.
3. Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the
enemy.
4. Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.
5. Ridicule is mans most potent weapon.
6. A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.
7. A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.
8. Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and
actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.
9. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing
itself.
10. The major premise for tactics is the development of
operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
11. If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will
break through into its counterside.
12. The price of a successful attack is a constructive
alternative.
13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.
The remaining 11 rules Alinsky describes are concerned with the ethics of means and ends:
1. Ones concern with the ethics of means and ends varies inversely with ones personal interest in the issue Accompanying this rule is the parallel one that ones concern with the ethics of means and ends varies inversely with ones distance from the scene of conflict.
2. The judgment of the ethics of means is dependent upon the political position of those sitting in judgment.
3. In war the end justifies almost any means.
4. Judgment must be made in the context of the times in which the action occurred and not from any other chronological vantage point.
5. Concern with ethics increases with the number of means available and vice versa.
6. The less important the end to be desired, the more one can afford to engage in ethical evaluations of means.
7. Generally success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics.
8. The morality of a means depends upon whether the means is being employed at a time of imminent defeat or imminent victory.
9. Any effective means is automatically judged by the opposition as being unethical.
10. You do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments.
11. Goals must be phrased in general terms like Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, Of the Common Welfare, Pursuit of Happiness, or Bread and Peace.
The Trump supporter should have treated Chuckie to a fresh knuckle sammich.
Voter intimidation. It’s a felony.
Schmucky is such a tool.
Too bad Schumer didn’t have his teeth removed, maybe followed by his head hitting the curb a few times for an attitude adjustment.
Once again, Schmuck Schumer shows his constituants and the world what an asshole he is. Always has been, always will be. Hard to understand how he keeps getting re elected. Low class, no class. PUTZ.
More symptoms of Hopium Withdrawal.
Liberalism is a mental disorder.