Posted on 03/21/2017 3:45:58 PM PDT by qaz123
Several people have compared Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch with former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.
Senator Dianne Feinstein tried to draw a contrast between the two men on the Second Amendment, but was unable to do so.
(Excerpt) Read more at sarahpalin.com ...
Feinstein completely misrepresented and misstated this quote. She had Scalia saying something he did not. Gorsuch apparently has not studied Heller. Or, he would have pointed out her twist.
Judging by that clip, I’d say we don’t have much to worry about with Gorsuch.
>
“Add to that, what Cruz said today about him being confirmed 10 years ago, with NO objections.”
I said on another thread, as this is true, McConnell should take a page out of the Dim playbook and “deem” Gorsuch approved.
>
The only page McTurtle uses are the ones where the final step states “PROFIT”, be that personally $$\power a/o D.C. McScrotum hasn’t done a lick (no pun intended) for The People, unless as a by-product to the former.
One has heard more from the minority party than the ‘leadership’ since Jan. 20th (excepting the snake-sale on Ryan\RINO-care).
It happens. I know you didn’t want that.
I watched Feinstein's embarrassing display of 25 years of Federal legislative "experience" and ignorant as I am about sicko politics,I wanted to respond eventually, but haven't had the time.
However, someone else did an amazing job of responding to all the non-sequiturs, subject changes and irrelevancies Feinstein managed to jam into the few minutes of her amazing "statement : "
Charles Brown:
"Sen. Feinstein has a lot to learn about history. The Salem witch trials were about 100 years before the Revolution. Also, the Constitution never called for slavery. The founding fathers tried to put a prohibition on slavery, but were stopped by the southern colonies who said that they would leave the Union before slavery was prohibited. They tried to make good on that threat about 60 years later and lost. She is correct in saying that the Constitution can be changed to reflect changes in society but she does not seem to understand the process. The Constitution can be amended by a three fourths vote of the states. This has been done several times. Where she errs is that it cannot be changed by judicial fiat no by executive order. She and other progressives have corrupted our law and the separation of powers between the three branches of government for too many years. We are trying to restore that balance now. Sen. Feinstein, Sen. Schumer, and many others of their ilk (not all are Democrats) are examples as to why we need term limits."
That is one comment of several insightful responses. The entire article responding to Feinstein's pitiful attempt to act as a senior "diplomat" can be found at...
[[I am hating democrats more after seeing what they are subjecting him to. CT’s blumenidiot is despicable.]]
Let’s just hope that America’s independent voters feel the same way- let’s hope their eyes are finally being opened to just how despicable the far left truly are
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.