I find your post to be devoid of logic.
You do realize that the higher edumacation professorial set of “positions” is largely government academic/white collar welfare...,
What is the alternative logic then? As far as I can tell, the “dissenters” want the term ‘planet’ to mean every object they feel a sentimental connection to. The problem is that we don’t all feel the same way. Where is the science? Or should there be no definition for planet at all? Is it a ‘bad’ term? If you find my logic flawed, fist explain the correct solution.