To: vooch
Fedgov would simply rack up the debt again.
5 posted on
03/12/2017 5:12:04 AM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
To: Red in Blue PA
Great idea! Devil in the details, but pay off a big chunk of debt and build a Wall
To: Red in Blue PA
“Fedgov would simply rack up the debt again”
I agree. Because in theory the land “belongs” in trust to the taxpayers, although some would argue that it belongs to the citizens. Of course I disagree with the citizens having any rights unless they are paying taxes. Non taxpayers shouldn’t even be allowed to vote as far as I’m concerned. Neither should welfare recipients. But hey, I’m just shootin’ my mouth off as usual...
16 posted on
03/12/2017 5:25:43 AM PDT by
Clutch Martin
(Hot sauce aside, every culture has its pancake, just as every culture has its noodle.)
To: Red in Blue PA
Fedgov would simply rack up the debt again.
++++
Unfortunately TRUE. And a highly insightful observation.
28 posted on
03/12/2017 5:47:36 AM PDT by
InterceptPoint
(Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
To: Red in Blue PA
Beat me to it. And truer words were never spoken. Not to mention the unfunded liabilities dwarf the acknowledged debt.
31 posted on
03/12/2017 5:58:31 AM PDT by
Wolfie
To: Red in Blue PA
Fedgov would simply rack up the debt again. What you said x 10!
54 posted on
03/12/2017 6:55:35 AM PDT by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: Red in Blue PA
Fedgov would simply rack up the debt again. Correct. No different than a person selling their house to pay off credit card debt.
80 posted on
03/12/2017 9:09:16 AM PDT by
etcb
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson