Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bull Snipe

Comparing Grant to Hood is appropriate and interesting if you know anything about the US Civil from a tactical point of view. Grant and Hood were tactical soul mates.


27 posted on 03/09/2017 6:37:57 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: central_va

Not even close. Grants campaign at Vicksburg is a text book example of original thinking. He outsmarted Lee crossing the James. Hood by the time he was given command of the AOT had already lost a leg, had an arm shattered and probably was probably on drugs for the pain. From a tactical point of view, Cold Harbor was a failure, Grand said so in his memoirs, Lee never admitted a mistake for the thousands of Confederate soldiers lives he threw away attacking up Malvern Hill or Cemetery Ridge. Both assaults up hill, against an enemy waiting for the attack and backed up by massive artillery support. As a matter of fact, at Malvern hill, Union infantry watched their artillery slaughter Lee’s troops and most didn’t even have to fire their rifle muskets during the battle.


31 posted on 03/09/2017 6:48:22 PM PST by Bull Snipe (ueewl ocwe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson