Your post brings to mind the single most dishonest aspect of the Obama apologists. They treated every issue, anomaly, coincidence, and other aberration as unique. I.e.: every item was handled in a vacuum.
For example, they would argue that the odds of a date-stamp eventually malfunctioning were fairly high. So why should it be unreasonable to posit that a date-stamp malfunctioned on the day Obama registered?
Back then I would actually take the time to list the many, many such anomalies and issues with Obama’s records and his lies. I would say no one is so jinxed that ALL these weird, unusual things just happened to happen to him.
Nowadays I know better. Obama’s defenders genuinely cannot add 2 plus 2 and get 4. All they know is that Obama is honest and legitimate, and birthers are crazy. Trying to reason it all out with a goldfish would be more productive.
I stopped trying, years ago. I figured they had delusional, perhaps even the beginnings of the Strong Delusion, and reprobate minds.
Any more, I just nod and walk away, for the most part.
I conclude that many of them were paid trolls. Some, I believe, were even highly trained attorneys. Proof? No. Of course not. But that is what I strongly suspect. Perhaps in time the truth will come out.
From UCCIS site: "U.S. law requires companies to employ only individuals who may legally work in the United States – either U.S. citizens, or foreign citizens who have the necessary authorization. This diverse workforce contributes greatly to the vibrancy and strength of our economy, but that same strength also attracts unauthorized employment."
"E-Verify is an Internet-based system that allows businesses to determine the eligibility of their employees to work in the United States. E-Verify is fast, free and easy to use – and it’s the best way employers can ensure a legal workforce."
Wasn't Obama an ice cream scooper? He's never had a Form I-9? Has he ever worked at a real job?
That may sound funny, but really, does he have any employment history?