Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just Now: Limbaugh Caves on Dreamers
vanity | FEB 22 2017 | Arm_Bears

Posted on 02/22/2017 10:34:32 AM PST by Arm_Bears

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last
To: Arm_Bears

There is NO reason for the DACA program to continue. It should be ended immediately.

If it takes a short while to schedule their deportation, fine. But they’re not staying. And we certainly shouldn’t allow more to enter.

Apart from Clinton’s criminality and repulsiveness, immigration is THE issue which got Trump elected.


101 posted on 02/22/2017 1:43:21 PM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
"By the way, I am ok with dreamers who turn 16-23 in 2017 and no younger and no older."

DEPORT THEM ALL! They can dream all they want in Mexico.

102 posted on 02/22/2017 1:52:28 PM PST by Godebert (CRUZ: Born in a foreign land to a foreign father.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I am not ‘okay’ with any of them if they are here illegally and not born here.

I am so torn over this. First of all Dreamers did not break the law if they were 6 months when they came here. Second if they are not 20 and in college and didn’t even know they were illegal, how can we kick them out of the country? To where? Do they know the language? Customs? etc. I want to start with all the adults who came here which is around 10 million. 750,000 are Dreamers. We can wait till the end on those.


103 posted on 02/22/2017 2:02:26 PM PST by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

“This WILL ALL BE SOLVED when the jobs and benefits DRY UP!!!!”

__________________________________________________

Exactly. Remove the carrot and you may not need the stick.

Also, enforce laws so employers pay the price when they hire illegals, and look into ways to solve the Western Union moneygram problem for those who work under the table.


104 posted on 02/22/2017 2:18:32 PM PST by proud American in Canada (May God Bless the U.S.A. (Trump: I will bear these slings and arrows for you, the American people)o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

Rewarding the lawbreakers? NEVER! Shame on Rush for being OK with any part of this nutty idea!


105 posted on 02/22/2017 2:19:15 PM PST by alstewartfan (Old admirals who feel the wind Are never put to sea. Al Stewart from Past Present & Future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

NOT OK with it. Reward all the lawbreaking parents who skipped the lines to come here? ASININE and suicidal!


106 posted on 02/22/2017 2:20:49 PM PST by alstewartfan (Old admirals who feel the wind Are never put to sea. Al Stewart from Past Present & Future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Out of curiosity, why that age band?


107 posted on 02/22/2017 2:23:22 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: chajin; Arm_Bears

Don’ bother trying to explain to a “Principled Conservative”.

He is busy keeping the Left alive by refusing any solution that doesn’t completely conform to his every wishes.


108 posted on 02/22/2017 2:25:12 PM PST by Redleg Duke (He is leading us in Making America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

The statutes require that naturalized citizens must take an oath that renounces loyalties to foreign states, but in practice, dual citizenship is increasingly tolerated. The taking of an oath of military service or public office in a foreign country may raise problems at the margins, but even that is increasingly tolerated.


109 posted on 02/22/2017 2:43:00 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Roughly the age of kids able to live on their own or with a friend’s parent, and I really only wanted kids with promise to educate themselves or gain work experience to be productive and become decent legal residents. Of course they can have zero crime or gang affiliations at all.

I’d want no one here illegally, if I were queen. If I had to settle for some staying, it would be young people with great promise - but the folks gots to go.


110 posted on 02/22/2017 2:43:24 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Greenperson

I believe that is the approach. A flood of DACA types deported for criminal misconduct would do much to restore the credibility of US law enforcement.


111 posted on 02/22/2017 2:52:41 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: angry elephant

With those constraints, the remaining DACA types will be law-abiding and conscientious — Republican conservatives in training.


112 posted on 02/22/2017 2:55:48 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

Ending anchor babies is a big heft because a US Supreme Court opinion lends support to the view that their citizenship is based on the 14th Amendment. Hell no, I say, and we may have a President who agrees.


113 posted on 02/22/2017 2:59:39 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

The things that kills me in all this is that the promise of 1986 was not kept and, if actions mean anything, was never intended to be. I can’t help but think off all the citizens who have lost their lives thanks to the chaos that is today’s immigration policy. What about their dreams? What about the families that were broken up by the acts of others that were never supposed to be here? For thirty years...

I guarantee you that more citizens’ lives have been lost to illegals than all the events of 911 and all the American blood spilt on foreign soil between 1986 and 2016. We were promised security during that time and that promise was empty.

In addition to the lost lives is the lost treasure. Jobs and opportunities and wage stagnation so that illegals could come in while the jobs went out. And the taxpayers were on the hook for all that for all those years and for yet another $20 TRILLION in the future. And how many stories of gratitude to the nation that grants them unearned have you heard to counter-balance to the stories of lives lost and families ruined?

For 30 years the American People have been patient, tolerant, generous—and _utterly had!_ And in 2017 we are being asked to go through it again _before_ the borders are even secure!

Absolutely not! Secure the border and make the world know the American people are serious are about dealing with illegal immigration and sending back the criminal aliens among us before we even talk about granting another round of amnesty!


114 posted on 02/22/2017 3:43:19 PM PST by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

It’ll be more politically palatable down the road, once the wheels of justice have been properly greased and the worst offenders are removed from our country.


115 posted on 02/22/2017 4:20:50 PM PST by upsdriver (I support Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Okay, I think I get the lower age limit, since they presumably have illegal parents that should be sent home—though that further works against the idea that it would be somehow cruel to send the kiddos home with them (as if the parents would abandon them here anyway) — but if they are older and have completed school and not been criminals otherwise, I don’t see why they should go home sooner than the demographically young adults should.


116 posted on 02/22/2017 4:24:14 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

“It’ll be more politically palatable down the road, once the wheels of justice have been properly greased and the worst offenders are removed from our country.”

I agree with you on that. People will be accustomed to it.


117 posted on 02/22/2017 4:46:38 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Question: do people becoming naturalized citizens have to renounce their citizenship to their home country?
__________________________________________

Yes I had to so when I went for my final interview one month before the ceremony...I raised my right hand and swore that I renounced my current citizenship...

and I came from an ally, a British country, New Zealand, and not a 3rd world one ...

It is part of the naturalization process...I had no choice if I wished to become an American citizen...I could not be both...

for those 30 odd days my new Zealand passport was no longer recognized by the US or any other country, and I could not leave the US because I no longer had a valid passport...

as soon as I went through the ceremony, I was eligible to apply for a US passport...


118 posted on 02/22/2017 5:49:39 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Liz; AuntB; La Lydia; sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; 2ndDivisionVet; ...

#118


119 posted on 02/22/2017 5:52:17 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Thanks for the info. Don’t know how long ago your naturalization was but Congratulations!


120 posted on 02/22/2017 5:57:32 PM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson