As near as I can tell "inclusiveness" is code language used by the left to legitimize excluding those who have the mistaken moral orientation that they believe folks out to work for a living, in other words contribute through labor or other deeds to the well-being [especially material] of the society in which they live [food, shelter, health, parenting, educating, etc.]
You have magnificently coalesced something which has been percolating in my gray matter for decades but have never been able to put a finger on it. That makes perfect sense. Thank you!
In Whitman’s case, isn’t *inclusive* code for gay? It’s admittedly been decades upon decades since I encountered his work, but that is what I’ve always presumed.