To: MtnClimber
All of the issues legitimately raised by skeptics were potential biases: data selection, temperature-station siting, data adjustment, and heat island. The fifth was potential bias from the large number of adjusted parameters that were used in the global climate models, and from the instability of those enormous simulations. We came up with a solid analysis of each of the biases and were able to conclude, using our independent work, that global warming was real and caused by humans.My goodness! Doesn't he sound brilliant? Every word of that was gobbeldygook. The false premises are coming out of his ears.
![](http://e.lvme.me/l3usmo1.jpg)
64 posted on
02/11/2017 11:21:41 AM PST by
TigersEye
(Winning. Winning winning winning every day!!!)
To: TigersEye
He’s proved it beyond a shadow of a doubt, with geometric logic.
To: TigersEye
I know. How bright do you have to be to see that the temperature increase is just the cumulative effect of their “adjustments”.
71 posted on
02/11/2017 11:42:07 AM PST by
MtnClimber
(For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson