Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What The UN Doesn't Want You To Know: The Father Of The UN Was An American Communist
Forbidden Knowledge ^ | Unknown (1990's) | Irvin Baxter, Jr.

Posted on 02/08/2017 6:43:40 PM PST by Sontagged

A young American diplomat was the leading force in the designing of the United Nations. He was secretary of the Dumbarten Oaks Conversations from August to October of 1944 where most of the preliminary planning for the U.N. was done. He was Roosevelt's right-hand man in February of 1945 at Yalta where the postwar boundaries of Europe were drawn (Roosevelt was a dying man at the time. His death came only ten weeks later).

At Yalta, it was agreed that the Soviet Union would have three votes (one each for Russia, Ukraine, and Byelorussia) in the U.N. General Assembly, even though the United States had only one.

At Yalta, much of Europe was placed under the iron heel of communist rule.

At Yalta, Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin appointed this young diplomatic shining star to be the first Secretary-general of the U.N. for the founding conference held in San Francisco,April/June of 1945.

All of this seemed well and good until three years later when Alger Hiss was exposed as a communist spy and sent to prison. Only then did people understand why the emblem of the United Nations looked so much like the emblem of the Soviet Union.

It now made sense that the Soviet Union, at Yalta, was given control over all of Eastern Europe. Then everyone understood how the Soviet Union managed to capture three votes in the U.N. General Assembly compared to one for the United States. Then it became clear why a secret deal had been struck stating that a communist would always hold the office of of head of the U.N. military.

The U.N. charter was authored by a communist, the first U.N. Secretary-general was a communist, and the U.N., from the beginning, was designed to be a Union of World Socialist Republics.

On a recent tour of the U.N., not one mention was made of any of this by our guide. Alger Hiss' name was not mentioned one time. When pictures of the founding conference contained Hiss' picture, our U.N. guide avoided telling us who it was.

I'm sure everyone was taught about the United Nations and its importance in school, but I'm also sure that the above information was conveniently omitted from your textbooks!

Secret agreement: U.N. military to Always Be Commanded By A Communist

One of the most important positions within the entire United Nations—if not the most important—is that of Undersecretary-general for Political and Security Council Affairs.

Most Americans have never even heard of this position, much less anything about the man who holds the job. The undersecretary-general for political and security council affairs has three main areas of responsibility.

They are:

1. Control of all military and police functions of the United Nations peacekeeping forces.

2. Supervision of all disarmament moves on the part of member nations

3. Control of all atomic energy ultimately entrusted to the United nations for peaceful and “other purposes”.

In view of the fact that these three functions may soon constitute the ultimate power of life and death over every human being on the face of the earth (once national disarmament is achieved and all military is under the control of the U.N.), there would appear to be some minor justification for us to be more than passingly curious over who wields this power.

Since the United Nations was created in 1945 there have been fifteen men appointed to the position of undersecretary-general of political and security council affairs.

Astonishingly, every single one of them has been a communist!

Communists Appointed To The Position of Undersecretary-General

Arkady Sobolev--USSR (1946-1949)

Konstantin Zinchenko—USSR (1949-53)

Ilya Tehernychev—Ygoslavia (1954-1957)

Anatoly F. Dobrynin—USSR (1958-1960)

Georgi Ptrovich Arkadev—USSR (1960-1962)

Eugeny Dmiterievich Kiselev—USSR (1962-1963)

Vladimir Pavolovich Suslov—USSR (1963-1963)

Alexie E. Nesterenko—USSR (1965-1968)

Leonid N. Kutakov—USSR (1968-1973)

Arkady N. Shevchenko—USSR (1973-1978)

Mikhail D. Sytenko—USSR (1978-1981)

Viacheslav A. Ustinov—USSR (1981-1986)

Uasiliy S. Safronchuk—USSR (1987-1992)

Vladimir Petrovsky—Russia , “former USSR (1992-)

James O. C. Jonah—Sierra Leone (Co-chairman)

Some observers feel that fifteen Communists out of fifteen appointees constitutes a trend of sorts. But whatever we call it, Trygve Lie, the first secretary-general of the United Nations, revealed that this pattern was no mere coincidence.

In his book In the cause of Peace, Lie wrote: "Mr. Vyshinsky (of the USSR) did not delay his approach. He was the first to inform me of an understanding which the Big Five had reached in London on the appointment of a Soviet national as assistant secretary-general for political and security council affairs...

"Mr. Stettinius (U.S Secretary of State) confirmed to me that he had agreed with the Soviet delegation in the matter...

"The preservation of international peace and security was the organization's highest responsibility, and it was to entrusting the direction of the Secretariat department most concerned with this to a Soviet national that the Americans had agreed." (From The Fearful Master by Edward Griffin)

Every U.N. Secretary-General Has Been A Socialist

No wonder someone said that the truth is stranger than fiction! This incredible saga of the United Nations just goes on and on. Perhaps the most revealing fact of all concerning the powers that control the United Nations is that every single Secretary-general since the U.N.'s formation has been a socialist.

Trygve Lie from Norway was the first elected head of the U.N. He was chosen by the fifteen-member U.N. Security Council and ratified by the U.N. General Assembly on February 1, 1946.

Lie, at the age of twenty-three, was appointed secretary in charge of administration of the Norwegian Labor Party. The socialist lawyer served as Minister of Justice until June 1939, when a Cabinet reorganization made him Minister of Commerce. In April 1945, Lie was chosen to head the Norwegian delegation to the United Nations Founding Conference at San Francisco. At the conference itself he was chosen chairman of Commission III which was charged with drafting the charter of the Security Council of the United Nations, "the organ...which would have the power to act against aggressors."

Dag Hammarskjold of Sweden was elected Secretary-general of the United Nations on April 7, 1953. At the age of thirty, Hammarskjold became Undersecretary of the Swedish Ministry of Finance. At the Ministry he worked under the Fabian socialist economist Ernst Wigforss, whom he once said considered his second father. Sweden has long been the leading socialist state of Western Europe, taxing its citizens at a 75% rate.

U Thant of Burma was elected Secretary-general of the U.N. on November 30, 1962. According to Current Biography 1962, U Thant considered himself a democratic socialist.

Kurt Waldheim of Austria took office as Secretary-general of the United Nations on January 1, 1972. Waldheim had been Austria's U.N. ambassador from 1964 to 1968.

When the Austrian Socialist party won the March 1970 elections, Waldheim again became Austria's U.N. representative. After serving two terms as U.N. Secretary-general, Waldheim became the head of Austria. It was revealed that Waldheim had lied about his role while serving in the Nazi forces of Adolf Hitler. Facts that were made known resulted in Waldheim being banished from the United States, even though he was the head of Austria.

Javier Perez de Cuellar became U.N. Secretary-general on December 15, 1981. In his address to the General Assembly after being sworn in, Perez de Cuellar called the disparity in wealth between rich and poor nations a violation of "the most fundamental human rights." During his administration, some third-world spokesmen complained that Perez de Cuellar had not been sufficiently outspoken in promoting the massive transfer of resources from rich to poor nations on a global scale (Wealth redistribution has always been the central plank in the platform of international socialism).

"I am a third-world man," the Secretary-general replied. "But first of all I am a representative of 157 countries. I have to act in a way so that I am not only the representative of the third world."

Boutros Boutros-Ghali, the former foreign minister of Egypt, became the first African to head the U.N. on January 1, 1992. "If I was offered the job (of secretary-general) five years ago," Ghali said, "I would have turned it down. The U.N. then was a dead horse, but after the end of the Cold War, the U.N. has a special position." Politically, Boutros-Ghali was a member of the Arab Socialist Union.

Is it coincidence that one communist and six socialists have headed the United Nations since its birth in 1945?

Does it seem strange at all that the driving message of the U.N., the message of wealth redistribution, is the central message of international communism? Do you find it amazing that the United States has allowed the Soviet Union to have three votes to our one in the United Nations since 1945?

With the supposed dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1992, each of the fifteen member of the ex-Soviet Union now have a vote in the U.N. So now we are outvoted fifteen to one. Yet Russia retains the right to invade these states if they get out of line.

So what does all this mean? the plain truth is that the United Nations has been designed to be a communistic world government from its very beginning.

What will happen?

The United Nations will obtain the world domination that it has been planning for since its beginning. Communism will achieve its dream of ruling the world, but only for a very short time. We know this because the New World Order beast of Revelation 13 appears in another prophecy in Revelation 17. In Revelation 17:3 the beast is red. Red is used by God in another prophecy Communism (See chapter 3 of A Message for the President). And why not?! Red is the official color denoting Communism—Red China, Red Russia, et al.

There are some dreadful times just ahead for this world. The consolation is that the deep darkness that lies just ahead will soon be replaced by the glorious dawning of the kingdom of our Lord and savior Jesus Christ. And He shall reign forever!!

TOPICS: AMERICA - The Right Way!!; Education; History; Reference
KEYWORDS: algerhiss; communisttakeover; unitednations; whittakerchambers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Trump needs to boot the United Nations and their Lucis/Lucifer Trust cult worshippers out of New York. Let them set up shop on someone else's dime.
1 posted on 02/08/2017 6:43:40 PM PST by Sontagged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sontagged

Get out of the UN and get the damned UN off our soil!!

2 posted on 02/08/2017 6:47:27 PM PST by WENDLE (Trump RULES IMMIGRATION!! Sanctuary crap will STOP or no money. ZERO!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Underscore “Damned UN” THX!

3 posted on 02/08/2017 6:48:08 PM PST by Sontagged (Woe to you when all men shall speak well of you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged
4 posted on 02/08/2017 6:54:00 PM PST by Chode (may the RATS all die of dehydration from crying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged
Arkady N. Shevchenko—USSR (1973-1978)

Didn't he defect? Wasn't he the one who asked for a prostitute and the CIA gave him a Yellow Pages?

5 posted on 02/08/2017 6:55:32 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

Back in the early 80s, I attended a speech by the late Arkady Shevchenko, then the highest-ranking Soviet official to defect to the West. He had been their top guy at the UN.

He spoke, interestingly, at KENNESAW COLLEGE — and we all know what Kennesaw is famous for! I’m proud to have played a small role in helping Mayor Darvin Purdy get that legislation through the Kennesaw City Council.

Shevchenko’s talk dealt with the clear intent of the leadership of the old Soviet Union (12/5/2015 UPDATE: ADD THE CURRENT LEFTIST CONTROLLED FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO THAT LIST!) to somehow take America. He mentioned their ICBMs and the nuclear blackmail threat they posed. (12/5/2015 UPDATE: MAKE THAT THE MUSLIMS!)

Then he broke from his prepared remarks and offered the audience this wisdom:

“The leaders of my country are as AFRAID OF YOUR 200 MILLION (12/5/2015 UPDATE: MAKE THAT 380 MILLION AND COUNTING!) PRIVATE FIREARMS as they are of your ICBMs. NEVER GIVE UP YOUR GUNS.”

Frankly — and, while he had to be careful as he was under FBI protection at the time, Shevchenko alluded to this in his remarks — I’m as concerned about some domestic tyrant (say, a Hillary, Nancy Pelosi, Barack HUSSEIN Obama or Chuck Schumer) as I am about some foreign enemy.

And it is THAT threat about which the Founding Fathers were concerned that prompted them to leave us the Second Amendment.

The BIG question is: WILL WE KEEP IT?

6 posted on 02/08/2017 6:59:50 PM PST by Dick Bachert (de)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged; GraceG; MeganC; Army Air Corps; onyx; GOPsterinMA; Sarah Barracuda; ...

Very Informative!

7 posted on 02/08/2017 7:01:29 PM PST by KC_Lion ("I'm a believer that you don't need a title, and you don't need an office to make a difference"~S.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

Yes, you are right. Good book, though now I don’t trust any publication on these topics in the last forty years.

However, he was a commie or he would not have been appointed, as per the thesis of this article.

8 posted on 02/08/2017 7:01:47 PM PST by Sontagged (Woe to you when all men shall speak well of you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Thank you for your post and thank you for your outstanding patriotism, sir.

9 posted on 02/08/2017 7:02:54 PM PST by Sontagged (Woe to you when all men shall speak well of you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged

I didn’t even need to know this. All I know the U’ in UN stands for USELESS.

10 posted on 02/08/2017 7:07:18 PM PST by max americana (For the 9th time FIRED LIBERALS from our company at this election, and every election since 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged


11 posted on 02/08/2017 7:07:34 PM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (****happy dance**** BIGLY!!!! Shadilay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged

A nice aside is to understand that the founder of the ACLU, Roger Baldwin said: “”I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class and sole control of those that produce wealth: Communism is the Goal”

Most of the liberal institutions are founded through efforts of the international communists.

As for Hiss, read Witness by Whittaker Chambers. Wm F Buckley called it the best Biography of the 20th century.

12 posted on 02/08/2017 7:10:30 PM PST by KC Burke (Consider all of my posts as first drafts. (Apologies to L. Niven))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged
My older brother told me in the late 1950’s to not trust anything the UN said or did. He had just received a medical discharge from the USAF. I was a know it all teenager but it started making sense the older I got. I miss him. He had flown on bombers testing bombs. He had gotten so much radiation exposure that for years before he died, he was on about 20 kinds of drugs. He was my hero.
13 posted on 02/08/2017 7:47:55 PM PST by MamaB (Heb : 13:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
From: Phoenix Rising: The Rise and Fall of the American Republic by By Donald G. Lett

"There are many similarities between Russia and the U.N. For example, consider that most of the U.N. charter is copied word for word from Marx's Communist Manifesto and the Russian Constitution."

14 posted on 02/08/2017 7:54:27 PM PST by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only Hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged

There are still people who think Alger Hiss was unfairly maligned.

They have never read “Witness”.

“Witness” was the most politically profound book for me.

15 posted on 02/08/2017 7:58:08 PM PST by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke

See my Freeppage. I had posted Whittaker Chambers’ letter to his children, and his grandson emailed me and politely and nicely asked me to remove it, which I complied with.

One of the most moving books to me.

When I first read it, I thought it was primarily about politics. When I read it the second time, I realized it was about a man’s search for God.

16 posted on 02/08/2017 8:01:15 PM PST by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

I once was on a plane trip with a fellow that owned the old farm that Whittaker Chambers retired to with his wife and kids. He knew the history of it when he bought it and said he was never going to sell it.

The Pumpkin Papers were in that pumpkin patch.

17 posted on 02/08/2017 8:10:04 PM PST by KC Burke (Consider all of my posts as first drafts. (Apologies to L. Niven))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged

18 posted on 02/08/2017 8:12:03 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

If they don’t know about Alger Hiss, they missed it when the former USSR released his KGB files in the early/mid 1990s. Awarded the Order of Stalin or some-such cr*p for his “work” at Yalta.

19 posted on 02/08/2017 8:17:38 PM PST by Sontagged (Woe to you when all men shall speak well of you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged

I find this liberal doggedness in the belief that Alger Hiss was treated unfairly to be rooted in one of two reasons:

Either they know the truth but still refuse to see it, or they accept it, but think he was advancing the cause of communism, which is their religion.

Neither of those is a good thing.

20 posted on 02/08/2017 8:21:29 PM PST by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson