Bad Faith? I cited numerous sources (which obviously you didn't read.) in support of my argument. You know who is bad faith? Someone who keeps repeating a bit of text that doesn't even prove what he is alleging. (Should is not "Shall")
The waste of time was trying to pry you out of a mental rut and show you evidence that your revolutionary world view is in error.
You would simply prefer history to be as you imagine it, not as it can objectively be shown to be.
You’re on my “No-Fly-Zone” list and I’ll try not to waste my time including you in future discussions.
We didn't have a discussion. We had half a discussion engaging with a Dogma, and the Dogma just kept repeating itself.
Attempting to have a discussion with you made my head hurt when I try to keep up with the logical inconsistencies, contradictions with the historical record, and the constant repetition of irrelevant details that you seem to think proves something.
If you do not include me in any further such "discussions", I will consider myself lucky, but do not think that I will indulge falsehood rather than challenge it when I find it.
When asked to explain text in the Declaration of Independence that is contrary to your claims, you ran away and tried to deflect saying the text is “irrelevant” and “dogmatic” and “my head hurts”.
Smoke and mirrors. Deflection. Bad faith. A waste of time. Maybe medical problems.
Don’t call us, we’ll call you. The emergency room is available if you need it.
Bye.