To: SkyPilot
They never learn. Every time they try to create an all purpose aircraft they end up with a horrifically expensive fiasco. The only good multi-purpose aircraft they ever came up with started with single purpose naval fighters which were strong enough to handle everything they could strap on to them (e.g. the F4U and the F4 Phantom).
47 posted on
01/08/2017 5:59:20 PM PST by
chb
To: chb
Yup. At least the f-4 was a good aircraft, as you said.
As someone posted, the F-35 is the 21st century answer to the F-111.
49 posted on
01/08/2017 6:06:44 PM PST by
SkyPilot
("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
To: chb
The only good multi-purpose aircraft they ever came up with started with single purpose naval fighters which were strong enough to handle everything they could strap on to them (e.g. the F4U and the F4 Phantom).I was in Naval Aviation during this time. As I recall the AF totally would not buy another NavAir design. Pure politics; it's still going on, as far as I can tell.
58 posted on
01/08/2017 6:45:20 PM PST by
Ace's Dad
("America is Great because America is Good " Alexis de Tocqueville)
To: chb
The A-7 Corsair, A-4 Skyhawks and F-4 Phantoms, were all used by the Air Force (F-4, A-7) Navy(A-7, A-4, and F-4) and Marines(A-4, F-4)in multiple roles. It was good in all its roles and then some.
78 posted on
01/09/2017 6:14:44 AM PST by
Garvin
(The Fourth Estate is The Fifth Column.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson