It absolutely does not. NASA astronauts have said on record that we cannot pass the Van Allen radiation belt. There is stereoscopic analysis of moon pictures that prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they were not taken on the moon.
Look at the lunar lander when it’s on the moon. It’s literally scotch tape and tinfoil. NASA claims the tinfoil is to protect the astronauts by reflecting radiation. But there’s a huge section dead center not covered by it. There are multiple light sources where there should be one. There is no blast crater under the lunar lander in the pictures. There are no imprints in the dust from the lander legs, but a mans foot leaves one? All but one of the men that supposedly landed on the moon would not swear on a Holy Bible that they personally walked on the moon.
The moon landing happened at a time that was hugely advantageous to the USA. But we have never gone back when there is massive incentive to do so? Low G research and manufacturing that cannot be done on Earth that would advance human technology. You know why? Because we can’t and never have.
If we faked it in 69-72, wouldn’t it make sense to fake it now? Our technological ability to fake a moon landing is far beyond anything we had in the early 70’s.
Speaking of tinfoil, I understand they make excellent hats.
The Van Allen belts are shaped like a doughnut, which has a hole in its center. That is where the ISS roams. The Apollo ship was launched 75 degrees relative to the equator for a near polar orbit. When it exited the earth orbit it spent only 12 minutes in a weak portion of the Van Allen belts. The hull of the space ship was adequate shielding.
There is no blast crater under the lunar lander in the pictures.
In a vacuum, the rocket gasses disperse quickly. There was dust thrown up, but not deeply penetrating the surface.
There are no imprints in the dust from the lander legs...
There certainly are. The lander is sitting on top of them. The pads are a great deal thicker than what you see.
All but one of the men that supposedly landed on the moon would not swear on a Holy Bible that they personally walked on the moon.
It is not necessary to swear to affirm a well-proven fact. Men of faith do not consider doubters worth the effort.
The moon landing happened at a time that was hugely advantageous to the USA.
Yet Russia never made any effort whatsoever to label our landing as fake. Why is that? Could it be that they also tracked the Apollo ship to the moon and received the radio traffic from the surface using highly directional antennas?Numerous people tracked the flight with equipment that provides both range and direction. Not one of them believed it did not go to the moon.
But we have never gone back when there is massive incentive to do so?
There is no incentive to go back. It is dangerous and expensive. It would be really expensive to manufacture anything there and then return it to earth.
The moon landings occurred.
State what prevented the success of the Apollo mission. Explain in scientific and engineering terms. Do not state that is what you believe. You must indicate what technical challenge could not be overcome.