Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Amendment10
To the best of my understanding of the Constitution, it remains that since the ratification of the Constitution, the only way that the corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification feds can constutionally control how INTRAstate private property is used is to purchase the land in compliance with the 5th Amendment’s eminent domain clause.

Well, there is that pesky little First Amendment issue.

29 posted on 01/04/2017 5:26:30 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: PAR35; All
"Well, there is that pesky little First Amendment issue."

Noting that gasoline-powered vehicles did not exist when the amendable Constitution was ratified, just as with unconstitutional, but vote-winning Obamacare, there was nothing stopping Congress from exercising its Article V powers to petition the states for new powers to justify the religious-sounding bill as it affected local and state zoning regulations.

"In every event, I would rather construe so narrowly as to oblige the nation to amend, and thus declare what powers they would agree to yield, than too broadly, and indeed, so broadly as to enable the executive and the Senate to do things which the Constitution forbids." --Thomas Jefferson: The Anas, 1793.

Instead, the feds got away (again) with unconstitutionally expanding their powers imo, in this example by passing what was arguably a vote-winning, election year bill nonetheless.

30 posted on 01/04/2017 6:03:02 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson