Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Chainmail

It seems that you are claiming that the m16 is inaccurate. I’ve heard a lot of people make some pretty absurd claims about the m16 before but I’ve never heard that.


9 posted on 12/23/2016 5:13:57 AM PST by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Durus
The first versions of the M-16 fired a 55-grain bullet, used a powder that was not specified for the rifle and had ridiculous sights that could only be adjusted in administrative environments using a bullet tip. I have personally witnessed blizzards of massed M-16 fire miss bad guys in the open when he should have been hit immediately.

The dang things were designed for torrents of "to whom it may concern" rounds in consonance with army doctrine of the time.

On the other hand, I kept my M-14 long after everyone else was stuck with Matty Mattel through different forms of junior enlisted chicanery. My M-14 always fired and when it was properly aimed, nailed what it was aimed at. It could punch through cover, walls, gravestones, and pretty much else and dumped who it hit with the first round.

When I was eventually hit myself, my lieutenant crawled up to me and said "Sorry you're hurt Chainmail, but can I have your rifle?".

12 posted on 12/23/2016 8:59:36 AM PST by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson