Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Golden Eagle

“This statue isn’t of a historical figure...”

Then why is his statue in museums and why does he have his own wikipedia article? He was the lover of a Roman emperor, that makes him a historical figure, whether you like it or not.

“And since you’ve been gladly playing the part of Alefantis defense lawyer...”

Another lie.

“You keep insisting there’s no evidence against him, so how do you explain this?”

I already said, I see no reason to explain it. What is illegal about it that it should need to be explained?

“So far it looks like you can’t explain it...”

Looks to me like you can’t read if that is what you get from my comment.

“you his biggest supporter”

Another lie. Do you think lying is going to help your case?


242 posted on 12/02/2016 2:03:56 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman
I already said, I see no reason to explain it.

Well then just go away and quit being so defensive when other people clearly see this as a link to pedophilia, since that's what the statue represents. Either explain why it doesn't tie to pedophilia, in any way possible, or quit commenting altogether, since you claim you see no reason to defend it.

243 posted on 12/02/2016 2:50:58 PM PST by Golden Eagle (In God We Trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson