[Golden Eagle]

I have a problem with people running around making accusations with no evidence, and then, on top of that, attacking people for pointing out that they are making accusations with no evidence.

There's plenty of evidence, in the eyes of many conservatives, and Clinton critics. You just aren't looking at this from that perspective.

[Boogieman]

“There’s plenty of evidence, in the eyes of many conservatives, and Clinton critics. You just aren’t looking at this from that perspective.”

See, this is what this comment means, to me:

“There is plenty of evidence, if you lower the standard of evidence because YOU WANT TO BELIEVE IT.”

That’s called confirmation bias. I try not to indulge in it.

If someone was making the same claims against someone we are fond of, for example, Donald Trump, then 99% of the board would be here with me saying “show us some real evidence”. But, since these accusations are made against your ideological opponents, people want to believe they may be true, so they are naturally not as skeptical. This is the same reason liberals are not skeptical when people call Donald Trump the next Hitler. They don’t require any solid evidence for the claim, because they want to believe it.