Replies

(reformatted)

Maybe it’s time we wake up a bit.
1) Trump won by narrow margins in 3 states.
2) Podesta came out and said it’s not over.
3) Hillary and Obama soon after came out and said it is over
4) We were all happy and figured the rest of the effort to get Trump into office was just a formality
5) We stop worrying about watching the ballots and the machines.
6) The Dems go dark, nothing from Hillary, Podesta, Obama questioning the election.
7) Stein files for recount, we all (me included) say it’s just a joke, a fund-raising scheme...and she raises lots of money.
8) Stein gives us soothing words - that she knows that Hillary lost, instead she just wants a complete tabulation, so as to legitimatize the results.
9) Hillary’s people join the recount effort.
10) No one on our side bothers asking why the Dems would want to ‘legitimatize’ Trump’s victory.
11) The big money requests from the state of Wisconsin comes in, we laugh...we told you so, just a fund-raising scheme.
12) Stein shuts us up by paying up.
13) So our main theory is blown out of the water - Stein/Hillary are serious about the recount.
14) Two more theories left:
A: They want to legitimize Trump’s victory.
B: They think they can overturn the results of the election.

Does anyone think that “A” is the answer?

If not, is anyone concerned that “B” may just happen? Are Trump’s lawyers watching (if so, they’re awfully quiet...totally opposite of Bush’s lawyers in 2000)? Are RNC lawyers watching? Do we know the chain of custody of all of the ballots/machines?

Finally, if the answers to the above are no, then are we prepared for Hillary to take office?

Good Summary - I’ve been saying since this first started that “something is up” and we are looking at the “shiny object over there” versus seeing what is really happening - Clinton will find a way to swing at least one state and then delay EV past 12/19. Our only hope of stopping this insanity is next Monday when PA Court hears arguments whether to recount or not. At least in MI I found this: “Trump hired Lansing election law attorneys Gary Gordon and Pirich to represent him in Stein’s recount.”

In my opinion, it’s B. With the course they are on, it’s at least a $10 million investment. They (Clinton) have had several weeks to map all of this out in great detail - down to what judges would hear the cases and who has access to the lock boxes, etc. There are videos of democrats stuffing ballot boxes BEFORE they knew the outcome, what the heck do you think they will do now that they know it’s so close and they are being told Hilter has been elected? I don’t think the votes (even with forthcoming cheating) are there to overturn the results, but I do feel they believe with some judicial assistance they can run this past the electoral college deadline creating a real mess. I don’t see them spending this much money and not having a good legal plan in place (See John Roberts, Obamacare) I also think the key to Clinton’s plan is they have figured out how many Trump electors they can flip thru whatever ways they see fit. This has all been presented to the false prism of foreign or hacking interference, which, in my opinion, is setting up a forthcoming narrative soon to drop which may get Obama, the FBI, the Justice Dept involved. For example, what if they get someone to confess they manipulated the votes and they didn’t actually do it? I’m well aware many will say I need to relax, I do expect the tin-foil references. I just don’t trust the Clinton and this is the kind of stuff they are very good at - cheating, extortion, breaking the law.

Trump is very smart, I hope and expect he will go on offense here very soon. Counter law suits, file FEC violation claims against Clinton and Stein. Potentially take action against states relative to federal law.

Let’s throw another possibility in the mix. Could Jillypoo have been hoodwinked onto doing this recount by some other source? Jillypoo may be a physician but I know plenty that are screwballs with respect to common sense. Now let’s suppose someone not directly connected to the Trumpster approached Jillypoo and convinced her to pull this attempted coup because they suspect there was voting irregularities and the Trumpster was the benefactor. Jillypoo swallows the bait hook line and sinker. She gets a crowd funding effort going and all the Libturds pitch in. She manages to get enough to challenge WI and is hoping to challenge MI and PA. Pickles graciously conceded but still thinks it is her right to the office so she quietly instructs her remaining staff to pitch in so it does not look like she is involved.

Now WI is a republican controlled state although it does not have a veto proof majority. Cities like Milwaukee are heavily DemocRAT and as usual the rural areas are Republican. Voter fraud is much easier in urban areas. The Trumpster has said all along there is ramped voter fraud. The Libturds are screaming that Pickles won the popular vote. Could this have been a trick to suck in the Libturds so that voter fraud could be exposed? Remember Priebus is from WI and now the Trumpsters right hand man. Walker and Priebus are good friends. On another note the Trumpster has done the Rope-a-Dope so many times during this election cycle and he always sucks them in.

Now that I have presented option 3 think about it. The Trumpster has to appear to not want to prosecute Pickles until he is firmly in office or Bammy will pardon her. The Trumpster has made some strange tweets in the past that always seem to come to fruitarian. The Trumster also stated early on that he was not in this for the fun, he intended to win. Could the Trumpster be playing the last hand in this election where he is holding the Royal Flush and Pickles hitched her wagon to a pair of Deuces?