Stein/Clinton only have one shot at A statewide recount in PA and that will today before a state judge. Along with the petition they must provide prima facia evidence of fraud or tabulation error according to PA Law. Since Stein and Clinton have both stated they have no evidence of fraud or other irregularities, if the judge follows PA Law, they must deny their petition due to lack of evidence!
If the judge wrongly approves the petition, then the judge is violating not only PA Law, but also Federal Law (Safe Harbor Law). One of those provisions prohibits states from changing election laws/rules AFTER the election. By approving this petition without adequate evidence, the judge would in essence be changing the law/rules post election and thus violate not only state, but federal law as well.
Below is a FR link on PA recount
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3498751/posts
Sounds pretty straightforward.
And proof that this is a stunt to claim that the court stole the election for Trump, just as they did in 2000 for Bush.