Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PROCON

Regarding the “Shall not be infringed.” part of that, I would imagine owning a firearm without a serial number has most likely been made illegal or requires massive amounts of governmental oversight and fees to possess.


8 posted on 11/27/2016 10:35:44 AM PST by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Delta 21

If you make it for personal use, you dont need a s/n.


15 posted on 11/27/2016 11:31:50 AM PST by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Delta 21

Firearms made before 1968 did not have to have serial numbers and are very legal to own.

There are millions of them out there and noted in another reply home made ones to not have to be serialized.


16 posted on 11/27/2016 11:50:49 AM PST by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Delta 21

I have a late 1940s vintage Remington .22 rifle that does not have a serial number. It wasn’t required until after the Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed.


42 posted on 11/27/2016 5:52:31 PM PST by Disambiguator (Keepin' it analog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Delta 21
I would imagine owning a firearm without a serial number has most likely been made illegal

Which is why my B-I-L asked me what serial number I would like on the deer rifle he made for me out of parts and pieces lying around his shop. He abhors the ATF.

72 posted on 11/28/2016 10:34:44 AM PST by HiJinx (It's Morning in America Once Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson