In the Wikileaks emails they were giving instructions to take large donations and break them into thousands of small $20 donations using fake doner names. They were taking say a 1 million dollar donation which is illegal and making it look like a bunch of regular folks donated it. Anything under $50 doesn’t need to be verified according to election rules, they even stated the $50 threshold in the email I saw.
So they are probably doing the same thing here, a bot is registering a bunch of small donations using a bogus list of addresses.
We've already seen that the DNC has been running a 'dirty tricks' campaign for several decades, by Creamer and others own admissions.
These tactics include outright violation of electoral rules, candidates direct collusion with PACS, threatened violence, collusion with the media, establishing 'fake stories',
even stories written and edited by the campaign staff, and subterfuge.
Now that there is direct evidence of numerous violations of election laws, funding, media bias, foreign investment into election campaigns,
where is the prosecution for these Federal rules violations ?
Where is the accountability and responsibility action by government for these violations ?
Instead, the 'perp' is fired, or resigns from the organization, and everybody acts as though that action is sufficient; more like "Opps, we got caught".
My response is "No, that's not enough", since the 'perp' moves along into another form of political skullduggery and rules violation.
Lets get some criminal prosecutions to end these violations, especially when it comes to electronic or foreign funding of political campaigns.
That was going to be my guess. Breaking up a big donation and using a list of names off one of their databases.