[ctdonath2]

And it IS necessary to prosecute her, if only to determine the extent & consequences of damage, and how to prevent recurrence. Even if she’s pardoned, the investigation must be fully pursued - which will at least destroy her reputation and likely induce suitable consequences.

[TheCipher]

And it IS necessary to prosecute her, if only to determine the extent & consequences of damage, and how to prevent recurrence.

Correct. She isn't the only one who has committed crimes. There is Huma, Mills, the IT guys, members of the State Department, etc. They all need to be prosecuted.

[Savage Beast]

I agree. Perhaps it seems sporting to pardon her, but it's not. People who have committed less offenses have been punished severely. Not only is the rule of law challenged, but the equal protection of all citizens under it is challenged--if her criminal conduct is not pursued.

To say that the Clintons have suffered enough is to ignore the suffering of other criminals.

Donald Trump promised America to clean up the corruption in Washington. Does he intend to fulfill his promises, or is he merely another corrupt politician? We shall see.

[Savage Beast]

What Trump must do is leave the question of prosecuting the Clintons--and anyone else--up to the Attorney General. Politics MUST be kept out of this! The Attorney General should decide ONLY on the merits of the case.

[Graybeard58]

which will at least destroy her reputation and likely induce suitable consequences.

Her reputation has already been destroyed among normal Americans and cannot be destroyed among liberals.