ROTFLMAO!
1 posted on
11/12/2016 6:56:49 AM PST by
samtheman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
To: samtheman
Basically admitting that they and their reporters were essentially in bed with Hillary. Too little, too late. I hope Trump denies them access completely... No White House reporter, no interviews, no access at all. Oh... And he should cancel his subscription as well.
26 posted on
11/12/2016 7:06:29 AM PST by
jerod
(Pro-Abortion Gun Control Freaks & Environmental Nuts who hated Capitalism? The Nazi's)
To: samtheman
27 posted on
11/12/2016 7:06:41 AM PST by
tinyowl
(A is A)
To: samtheman
We cannot deliver the independent, original journalism”
Should have stopped right there, he finally said something that wasn’t a lie.
28 posted on
11/12/2016 7:06:45 AM PST by
ecomcon
To: samtheman
“Sulzbergerwho insisted that the paper covered both candidates fairly....”
“But we also approach the incoming Trump administration without bias, he said.”
Laughable, shows they don’t get it and will never get it. Hopefully Trump just ignores them, like most of America already does.
To: samtheman
“...while rededicating itself to reporting on America and the world honestly.”
They are cultural elitists who are incapable of honest reporting - it’s part of their physical being...a zebra can’t change it’s stripes...
31 posted on
11/12/2016 7:07:47 AM PST by
IMTOFT
(At least I'm enjoying the ride...)
To: samtheman
NYT to have a critical eye towards reporting on the government now THAT THE REPUBLICANS WON......hahaha
32 posted on
11/12/2016 7:08:00 AM PST by
BRL
To: samtheman
The NYT asserts this ...
We believe we reported on both candidates fairly during the presidential campaign. You can rely on The New York Times to bring the same fairness, the same level of scrutiny, the same independence to our coverage of the new president and his team.
So, best I can tell, it is rededicated to changing nothing.
33 posted on
11/12/2016 7:08:12 AM PST by
Cboldt
To: samtheman
The Times is the clear front runner to win the Walter Duranty Honesty in Journalism Award.
34 posted on
11/12/2016 7:08:33 AM PST by
AlaskaErik
(I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
To: samtheman
eradicate sounds better. They couldn’t be honest if they were standing in front of God.
35 posted on
11/12/2016 7:08:42 AM PST by
Leep
(Last Days of Hillary)
To: samtheman
Sulzbergerwho insisted that the paper
covered both candidates fairly-- also sent a note to staffers on Friday reminding the newsroom to give the news impartially, without fear or favor.
But we also approach the incoming Trump administration without bias, he said.
Lol. Lies. All lies.
36 posted on
11/12/2016 7:09:12 AM PST by
ecomcon
To: samtheman
37 posted on
11/12/2016 7:09:24 AM PST by
OKSooner
(She was practiced at the art of deception, I could tell by her bloodstained hands.)
To: samtheman
They realized that the only person who believed their lies was Hillary Clinton.
-PJ
39 posted on
11/12/2016 7:10:07 AM PST by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: samtheman
40 posted on
11/12/2016 7:10:29 AM PST by
ArcadeQuarters
("Immigration Reform" is ballot stuffing)
To: samtheman
Gawd, Bagdad Bob’s speeches were more believable than this
41 posted on
11/12/2016 7:10:33 AM PST by
BRL
To: samtheman
The problem with "news" organizations that turned themselves into full propaganda outlets for the dems is that they would have to totally wipeout their workforce including top management to even be looked at.
Fox plays this game the best, they do a half and half mix most years until an election cycle then go full liberal except Hannity and have been doing it for years. Thank God they left Fox Business alone this cycle.
To: samtheman
43 posted on
11/12/2016 7:13:43 AM PST by
nuconvert
( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
To: samtheman
Is Carlos Slim now worried about the Justice Department?
44 posted on
11/12/2016 7:14:01 AM PST by
buwaya
To: samtheman
New York Times publisher vows to ‘rededicate’ paper to reporting honestly
When liars lie is it still a lie?
45 posted on
11/12/2016 7:14:10 AM PST by
JayAr36
(Just maybe the Repugnant party can be be brought back now.)
To: samtheman
But we also approach the incoming Trump administration without bias, he said. Up yours, Sulzberger, you pinch of $hit. You and your staff couldn't take a dump without bias.
46 posted on
11/12/2016 7:14:55 AM PST by
kevao
(Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
To: samtheman
I’ll believe that when I see it. In the meantime, I am not holding my breath.
This might be a call for objectivity. Or a call to double down (again) on its bias. We’ll see.
47 posted on
11/12/2016 7:16:11 AM PST by
exDemMom
(Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson